![]() ![]() ![]() Image Engineering has only been conducting tests for us since 2017, so its catalog of results is still limited relative to the entire universe of available cameras. ![]() (If you’d like the full breakdown of how Image Engineering tests cameras across a variety of metrics, pour yourself a strong cup of coffee and read this.) The Caveats The actual color data, plus the deviations, is included in each entry. Strong deviations were weighted double and the list was generated accordingly. For our list, we tallied the total number of noticeable and strong deviations for each camera. Red cells indicate that the camera produced a strong deviation from the reference color, light green represents a “noticeable” deviation and dark green represents a moderate. Based on the LAB color space, they calculate color error and differences in brightness, saturation and color tone.Įach camera test produces a chart which shows color deviations (Delta E). With the knowledge of the RGB color space (the commonly used sRGB), they convert the RGB data to the CIE-LAB color space. Reference data is provided to the analysis software along with the image being tested. Each of the 96 color patches is individually measured using a calibrated spectrophotometer. The colors in these patches have been selected with reference to the well-known X-Rite ColorChecker SG color target. To measure color reproduction, they use color patches within the TE42 test target. Image Engineering sets the camera color space to sRGB using the factory default for a color profile. If you’re interested in discovering which camera does the best job reproducing colors, we’ve collected data from our testing partner, Image Engineering, and ranked cameras from most to least accurate. When it comes to reproducing colors, not all cameras are created equal. The use of calligraphy inspired fonts allows for more emphasis and also looks very elegant.This article, first published in has been in June 2018, was updated on October 21, 2019. The use of simple sans serif letterforms for the descriptive parts allow for the text to be neat and easy to read. The typography on both the front and back work really well for me. What I like about this back cover is that they extended the design from the front to wrap around the back, adding to the cohesiveness of the packaging. I feel that they don’t go along too well with the pudding design and makes the cover feel a bit busy.īacksides of palettes are typically just blocks of texts that talk about the palette and the ingredients inside of it. The only thing I don’t really like are the small stars placed around the cover. Overall, the front cover design is very pretty and looks appetizing. It also catches the viewer’s attention because of the break in the color scheme. The color choices are very autumn influenced, but the touch of blue in the bowl adds a bit of emphasis so the eye doesn’t get used to the orange and yellow color pattern. The shapes are quite simple, but some areas have colors used for highlights and shading that add a bit of dimensionality to the cover. The theme of the brand is food and baking, so their color choice for the palette was based around pudding which was reflected in the product design. Most other make-up palette covers I have are quite minimalist and not as vibrant as this one. The design for this packaging has frequently had me starting at all the little details on it. I was given this eyeshadow palette as a Christmas gift and use it quite frequently. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |